Riverdale Review All articles
Fan Discussion

It Was Always Going to End Like This: The Clues Riverdale Left in Plain Sight

Riverdale Review
It Was Always Going to End Like This: The Clues Riverdale Left in Plain Sight

There's a particular kind of rewatch experience that only happens with Riverdale. You're sitting there, maybe a few seasons deep into the chaos — Gryphons and Gargoyles, maple syrup cults, Cheryl Blossom keeping her dead brother in a chapel — and you go back to the pilot just to ground yourself. And then it hits you. The seeds were already planted. The show was practically winking at you.

Whether that was intentional genius or a happy accident of increasingly unhinged writers' room energy is honestly still up for debate. But what's not up for debate is that Riverdale telegraphed its own spiral early and often. The question is whether we should have seen it coming — and what exactly it says about the show's DNA that none of it ever felt truly out of character.

The Pilot Already Had a Problem With Reality

Let's start at the beginning, because the beginning is weirder than people remember. Season one is often held up as Riverdale's prestige era — the moody, Twin Peaks-adjacent murder mystery that critics actually respected. And sure, comparatively, it was grounded. But even in episode one, the show is doing something slippery with tone.

Jughead's opening narration sets the whole thing up like a noir novel someone wrote while listening to a playlist called "Sad Americana." The dialogue is stylized to the point of parody. No actual teenager has ever said half of what these characters say in casual conversation, and the show knows it. That's not a bug — it's a feature. Riverdale established from frame one that it was operating in a heightened reality, not a realistic one. The moment you accept that, the leap to "the town is cursed by an ancient evil" becomes a lot shorter than it should be.

Cheryl Blossom: The Show's Earliest Warning Flare

If there is a single character who represents Riverdale's future more than its present, it's Cheryl. From her very first scene, she exists on a completely different frequency than everyone around her. She's theatrical, operatic, and completely unmoored from anything resembling normal human behavior — and the show treats this as charming rather than alarming.

Look at how early the Blossom family mythology gets strange. Twin siblings with an unusually intense bond. A family that runs the town through maple syrup money and quiet menace. A father who turns out to be a murderer. By the time we're watching Cheryl commune with Jason's spirit in season five or six, it doesn't feel like a departure. It feels like a destination the show was always driving toward with Cheryl behind the wheel.

She was never a realistic character. She was a gothic archetype wearing a cheerleading uniform, and Riverdale let her run.

That One Line in Season Two That Everyone Forgot

Here's a fun exercise: go back and watch the early parts of season two with fresh eyes. The Black Hood storyline is where most fans peg the beginning of the end — the moment the show started straining under the weight of its own ambition. But scattered throughout that season are lines of dialogue that feel almost prophetic in retrospect.

There's a moment — blink and you'll miss it — where a character offhandedly references Riverdale's history in a way that implies the town has always had a darkness that defies explanation. It's throwaway at the time. Background texture. But in context of everything that comes later, it reads less like world-building and more like the writers quietly giving themselves permission to go anywhere they wanted.

The Black Hood arc itself is instructive. The resolution is messy and the identity reveal frustrated a lot of fans. But what it really demonstrated was that Riverdale wasn't interested in clean answers. It was interested in sustained dread, sustained weirdness, and the feeling that nothing in this town was ever going to make complete sense. That's not a mystery show's philosophy. That's a horror show's philosophy. And the switch had already been flipped.

Gryphons and Gargoyles: The Point of No Return (Or Was It?)

Conventional wisdom says the Gryphons and Gargoyles arc in season three is where Riverdale officially lost the plot. And look, it's hard to argue. A fantasy role-playing game that drives teenagers to ritualistic suicide, overseen by a figure called the Gargoyle King — that is not where you expect a show about Archie Andrews to go.

But here's the thing: even that storyline has internal logic if you accept the show's foundational premise, which is that Riverdale is a town where normal rules don't apply. The G&G arc was bizarre, but it was also ambitious. It was trying to do something about teenage escapism, about the way kids disappear into fantasy worlds when reality is too brutal. The execution was chaotic, sure. The mythology was half-baked. But the impulse wasn't crazy.

What it did do, definitively, was signal to the audience that no genre was off-limits. After G&G, the supernatural wasn't a possibility — it was a guarantee. Every season that followed operated with that understanding baked in.

The Tonal Shifts Were Always Character Reveals

One of the more interesting things about tracing Riverdale's descent is realizing that the tonal chaos wasn't random. Every time the show lurched into a new genre — noir, horror, musical, supernatural thriller — it was usually centered on a specific character's emotional reality.

Betty's storyline keeps pulling the show toward psychological horror because Betty herself is a character defined by repression and darkness. Cheryl's arcs go gothic because Cheryl is essentially a gothic novel protagonist. Archie's plotlines go action-movie because Archie is, at his core, a simple hero archetype who needs punching and redemption in equal measure.

The show wasn't losing control of its tone. It was — whether consciously or not — letting its characters' internal worlds bleed into the genre of each episode. That's actually a coherent creative choice. It just looks like madness from the outside.

So Was It Inevitable?

Honestly? Yeah. Probably.

Riverdale was never built for restraint. It was built for sensation, for the next shocking image, the next impossible twist, the next moment that makes you text your friend "did that just happen" at 11pm on a Wednesday. The pilot planted that instinct. The writers nurtured it. And the audience — us, the fans who kept watching, kept theorizing, kept dissecting — rewarded it.

The descent into absurdity wasn't a failure of the show's vision. It was the completion of it. Riverdale told us exactly who it was from the beginning. We just wanted to believe it was something a little more respectable.

Looking back now, with all the context we have, those early warning signs don't read as mistakes. They read as promises. And whatever else you want to say about this show, it kept them.

All Articles

Related Articles

Chaos as Currency: Did Riverdale Accidentally Teach Every Teen Drama to Go Off the Rails?

Chaos as Currency: Did Riverdale Accidentally Teach Every Teen Drama to Go Off the Rails?

Red Flags, Real Feelings: Why Riverdale's Most Dysfunctional Couples Are the Ones We Can't Look Away From

Red Flags, Real Feelings: Why Riverdale's Most Dysfunctional Couples Are the Ones We Can't Look Away From

Frenemies Forever: Why Riverdale Keeps Burning Down Its Female Friendships